History of Pulleys Questions:


Question #1:

Do feminists dispute that men are physically stronger, or that modern technology didn't always exist?

Because in my experience, even most feminists acknowledge that men are physically stronger, and indeed, this has been utilised to reassert a aggregation of their double standards, much as "It's worse for a man to impact a woman because he's stronger," and so on.

But the artefact they go on most how there's no reason why men and women can't do the same jobs, I have to astonishment if they're aware that throughout most of history, "work" meant a large amount of fleshly labor. It wasn't movement in an air-conditioned office, filing paperwork like it is today. Given this, and also given the lack of reliable relationship control, it seems only natural that society would evolve to have men working and women in the bag - and perhaps also to view men as slightly more essential than women, as we were more essential to gild in this regard.

Yet, kinda than accept this basic, common sense explanation for ground gild evolved the way it did, feminists seem observed to implore that this has, in reality, been a large band of men wanting to bedevil women throughout the ages. Apparently, backwards when "work" meant hauling heavy shovels of coal every day, or hunting for violent animals with nothing but our fists and man-made spears, or cutting downbound large trees, shipping them for individual miles, cutting them up, and assembling a house with them using nothing but our bleak hands and maybe a pulley, women were constantly solicitation for the chance to injure themselves this artefact too, but us evil, vile men insisted on oppressing them by rigorous that exclusive we got to be tortured this way. I guess maybe we figured women were hogging every the injure with the pains of childbirth, and there wouldn't be some left over for ourselves unless we kept all the back-breaking impact for us.
I think it's funny that you're locution I'm the one who hasn't thought that through, Cirbryn.
Kat: I agree that women's natural roles should be reputable more, and they were play in about the nonmodern ages, and achievement their peak in Victorian times, but still continuing to the '50s. It wasn't men at least, not on a grandiose bit having a lack of attitude for women's natural roles that led them to enter the workforce, it was feminists promoting that view, that those roles were someways base to men's. I will acknowledge that maybe men should have condemned meliorate care to advert and revalue those primary roles that they filled, or feminism strength never have succeeded.

As for women wanting to start the men to prove they were capable of more, I would hit to say they've unsuccessful miserably at that, given how men still outperform them, and how the only reason they've been healthy to compete at every is because they've had to inconvenience us with things same affirmative state and women-only scholarships or pressuring colleges to take in a
certain number of girls. At this point, I think it's instance for women to go back and say "Okay we proven and failed, it's instance to go backwards to our uncolored roles now."
But men don't inconvenience each another for an "equal" shot at things. Men endeavor by the rules and acknowledge drive and effect. You talked about transfer others down, and it's women who are transfer more privileged men down in visit for this "My clean share" deal.

Either way, I conceive it's fundamentally stupid to fortuity up the family organisation over some petty "I poverty to be equal," crap. But we're going soured matter now, so you can e-mail me most this if you want to continue.
CIrbryn: No, actually, my question was rattling understandably most the hypocrisy of feminists who verify women were oppressed, and not about whether women should impact today, and everyone who feature this and didn't already hit a defect on their margin apprehended that point. This is just why I said it's funny that you think I haven't thought this through. I'm not feat to pay paragraphs going backwards and forward with you patch you essay to dissect what I wrote and try to debate that it meant something other than what everyone added apprehended it to mean. Everything I wrote was rattling clear.

Question #2:

Getting a crossbow or bow and arrow?

Hey guys i've ever been fascinated in the full bow n arrows thing. i stingy cmon some normal phallic upraised in ameirca who saw lord of rings or some older time war movie and the bow and arrow. cmonnn its a classic

yea guns r the new thing but nobody forgets the bow and arrow

and i've been watching the Walking dead....

and im older enough to acquire this stuff now.... and bow n arrow don't make good like guns to attract zombies. now im not saying were gunna hit a zombie apocolypse. but i conceive adding bow n arrows to my arsenal of boxing, tae kwon do, and wrestling. Im an painter and thats what i go to edifice for so im not that typical jocky cocky sporting ingest obligate @sshole.

it doesnt really concern what u say, i can go buy a crossbow or a bow and arrow at any freaking labour artefact store.

And after that its meet my job to practice and intend quicker and meliorate at aiming and from further distances.

Now im not old with crossbows at every but every i know is, u can fire more arrows, and u requirement inferior training.

with the classic u need more training, capableness and blast mark rate is slower. substantially according to history classes... i remeber crossbows raped lawful bows cuz the number of men a domain can aquire to weild a crossbow compared to a bow n arrow.

but i same the classic bow n arrow. But i invoke on whatever deer hunting steer and those bows don't modify look same bows anymore. things got like green lights and freaking thick sections all over it and its got like pulleys and threefold pulleys and like meet poop protruding out every over the bow.

So i need u to support me garner one!!! crossbow or the gesture n arrow? give me a good discussion and stricken attain a final decision. go acquire one and move practicing.

And il belike go labour mettlesome with my friends downbound southward in VA to see how it rattling is shooting some live animals.
hmmm when u said crossbows have alot more power....

man... u got me....

but harder to reload?? how so? and how hard is it to you? and how built are you? can u study it to an amount of strength required for something else?

and crossbows Negro thats what the hick in travel dead has too

but he only carries 3 crossbows.

and carrying a satchel on the backwards with 50 arrows for a crossbow would meet countenance funny...

gotta be ending zombies in style my friend.

Question #3:

describe the history of the pulley?



Question #4:

which would better for Project Freedom Rail road system or River system.?

in order to releive Cable manufaturing Companies whome may desire to produce the 300 or 600 Mile Bridge filler cable I Need to vantage this Star ship out from under this Stae of river we staleness use atleast 1 or more commonsensible shipping Routes = Avenues. this bounteous filler telegram could be rag'ed unto Souix Falls and the taken by kick unto the Chiwere Stae Line.or kept in digit pact and strang out over flat bed trailors.yet this many rail road cars hath naut been attempted unto this Date with in U:S History.the Wheel Pulley's and Tall Poles to Hold the Wire or cables up soured of Farmers Fields and Fences could be realised at an fairley economical Price. and would ready shipping cost way downbound for the cable supplier's.yet in School we lurn things about Spider webs that we also encounter in the Fishing business as well.Ti'z naut =not the Size of the Cable nor Wire's instead it is the Raw Tensile Strength .Examples of Huge Bass existence pulled in on diminutive Tess Fishing Line teaches us assets thing about Logistics and Future Engineering Task that we unitedly as A = 1 10 Finger and 10 Toes said to be Human Being species could pull off at this Date with in our possess U:S and World History.now that they Goverment investigators Know that My Face and body were once in the T:A:P:S photo album and the J:C;Penney Stores also.paying for these Task should be an easy Task for my Corperate Headquarters.yet remember I had been absent for assets Time now and other persons had sneaked in and condemned my place to steal my Wealth.yet never the less.Even the Mighty West Point and Fort general N;C know my grappling and the facts.that qwe must impact unitedly by Land By Sea & By Air to Set Project Freedom unto Successful Completion. High School students aurt naut amuned to having great Ideas.dont vexation she or it was digit Tough board some skid marking Ideas or the 4 important Rails I had designed would naut perceive this Star board one lowercase Bit.if its Ionized Shield is still employed the Arkansas Soil and Rock should slide off her or it pretty easily.yet we staleness ready watch and go andante gift the animals and Bugs Time to prep for the sudden drop from up high unto valley level low.& if the support pillers aurt 300 Ft crossways it would be cushy to figure in how haw large Bridge type steel beem's will be needed.yet those have been existence shiped for eld now.it's up unto You me and our forthcoming Engineer's now.we dispense for the Target expulsion Date of June the 9th,2010.yet if it verify sum time longer than that than thats meet the artefact it is.each step staleness be planned flawless.then we haw swing Her tail end over the Gulf and nose Her or it into our coastal ship Repair Yards.this will be upset 2 of this Project:you every intend to watch.

Question #5:

1995 buick riviera 3.8L supercharged v6 engine noise?

This car has been babied, serviced to the "T", has 168000 miles, full loaded, and a newborn transmission with most 2500 miles on it. Here is the problem--- out of the chromatic the car change like it was "missing" patch dynamical it home i feature that b\c it has "felt" like that before and overturned out to be a wind pack . This time, when I got bag most 20miles of dynamical 55mph i noticed engine noise around the backwards of the engine. The oil pressure is good, it has not ran hot, it has no blo-by, no albescent or chromatic smoke discover the back, the plugs were in beatific shape,supercharger oil was level and servied terminal month, i put newborn pulleys on the idler and on the supercharger. A "friend" told me it could be the flexplate. However- if it were the flexplate would the automobile shake under acceleration? Also- I undergo what GM guys are thinking-- the intake gaskets, they have been replaced along with the head gaskets last year. There is no water leaking into the oil, nor oil into the water. I am full stumped. I hate to bout this thing down, epecially since i know the history and hit been dynamical the car myself. Any ideas, or suggestions that I am overlooking? I did drain the oil to look for metal shavings, and nothing meet oil. Could it be the flexplate? If it were a rod or spun direction wouldn't i retrograde lubricator pressure? Any and every support appreciated-- impart you in advance.

    History Of Pulleys





Question #6:

Where Would You Rank The Internet As A Man-Made Creation?

Greater than the wheel? In front of or behindhand the invention of the printing press? Or the invention of essay itself? The lever/pulley? The airplane? The lightbulb? It is said that the Internet is the greatest creation of mankind. Really? Has it changed the instruction of story of Mankind as much as gunpowder?

BTW- I'm totally unsafe most what category to locate this discourse in.

Question #7:

Pulleys used in the Colonial Days?

I got aggregation on everything I need. EXCEPT, the uses of pulleys in the complex days. EXAMPLES, PLEASE? lol. I looked and i couldnt find it. I conceive it's dopy because i already had to encounter the uses of pulleys in History.



so any examples?




please and thanks :

Question #8:

Why do people act like Ancient Egptians were shirtless slaves that drug rocks up ramps?

They were around for 3000 years and scholars seem to think they were just officer builders with the ole wooden pulleys and rope. We have been around a lowercase over 200 years and countenance at the profession we achieved. You see every these pictures and video reenactments of slaves actuation these super rocks up 2 knot daylong ramps, I stingy what we don't think they scholarly how to ingest a freakin' horse or ox to vantage atleast?
I meet want to know why they don't get some assign another than they worked hornlike and fast.
Then you look at these Population History charts and it says from 10,000BC to 0AD the population was exclusive at 200 million? A civilization that lasted 3000 years without birth curb and contraceptives and that's it? In the terminal 100 eld alone the U.S. has additional 200 million. WTF?
I see the Egyptian people are ease around today but shouldn't there be a aggregation more? Was there really a batch or catastrophe?
And why does America seem so much more technologically advanced, did we just intend very serendipitous or have we been visited?
Great answers, thanks.
There are a few things I don't agree with, but that's meet me.
I don't conceive the ramp theory, I don't believe the enthusiastic pyramid was built in 14-20 years, and I uncertainty it was built meet to be a tomb for Khufu.
I understand chronicle was disagreeable back then but after so some centuries and much great monumental achievements It only seems natural to say their culture which module most definitely outgo ours had it mastered.
Thanks for the answers. Sorry I have more questions than answers, but shouldn't we all?

Question #9:

What is the worst Christian Torture Device in History?

What torture device do you think was the worst used in history to punish?

Here are a sample of injure devices used by Christians in powers to penalise nonbelievers, pagans, and sinners.

The Judas Cradle:

The individual is raised up by the rope or concern and then down until the vagina, anus or the coccyx rests on the point. The torturer could depart the pressure by hanging weights from the individual or rocking or upbringing and descending the individual from different heights.


The Pope's Pears:

The vaginal pear was utilised on woman who had with the Devil or his familiars. The rectal pear was used on supine male homouals and the test pear was utilised on unorthodox preachers or lay persons institute guilty of unorthodox practices. Inserted into the mouth, anus or vagina of the victim, the pear was expanded by ingest of the screw until the insides are ripped, extended and mutilated, almost always causing death. The spinous ends of the 'leaves' were beatific for cacophonous the throat, intestines or opening open.

Slow Burn

A 16th century figure to displace the individual in and discover of the fire, roasting him alive tardily instead of executing him every at once.

Crushed. Squeezing disbelief discover of the foolish

Extreme Makeover

The demolition – everybody's favourite. Well, perhaps exclusive of Inquisitors for whom it was the helper of pick after the pulley had failed. For the helpless victim perturbation of every joint in the embody and elongations up to 12" were possible. 'Surgeons' might set joints to allow the torture to be repeated. Severe lacerations and loss of murder would termination from racking modify without the added use of flushed blistering pincers to bout off nipples, tongues, ears, noses, and genitals.

Question #10:

Which scientist is this?

he's digit of the most famous geometers in history also a scientist and inventor. He discovered a principal that states an object settled in a changeful experiences not exclusive its coefficient actuation it descending but also an added ascending obligate equal to the coefficient of the fluid the object displaces. He also circumscribed the capital of the lever and invented the compound machine and the hydraulic screw. His greatest geometric achievements were in the earth of geometry, where whatever of his discoveries anticipated the basic idea of whole calculus. he evidenced that the volume of a sphere is two-thirds the intensity of the chamber circumscribing the sphere.......help please



** Powered by Yahoo Answers